Comments for The Wealth of Networks

Comment on Casade of Information in Networks by Panel recommendations « The Wealth of Networks

Panel recommendations « The Wealth of Networks — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:24:11 +0000

[...] Emergent Properties Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Plenary Panel session [...]

Comment on Trust ID panels results by Panel recommendations « The Wealth of Networks

Panel recommendations « The Wealth of Networks — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:24:04 +0000

[...] Trusted Resources [...]

Comment on Healthcare panel results by Panel recommendations « The Wealth of Networks

Panel recommendations « The Wealth of Networks — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:23:58 +0000

[...] Healthcare Panel [...]

Comment on Diginomics by Wallace R. Wood

Wallace R. Wood — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:26:42 +0000

In 1998, in response to over 30 years of research and writing on the subject of a future ‘digital economic’ system, I coined the word “Diginomics.” Much to my surprise, I found no evidence of its existence in any dictionary, so I submitted it to every English-speaking dictionary I could find. In 2007, Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary agreed to showcase the word on their website. Today, it’s amazing to see how the word has truly taken hold around the globe, fairly true to the definition that I assigned to it. Here is the ‘official’ definition:

DIGINOMICS (dij’i-nom’iks), n. – acronym of two words: digital and economics. (1) the status of development toward an all-digital economy conducted electronically in all financial dealings between buyer and seller; a cashless society where all moneys (incl. cash, coins, checks and credit) and transactions involving the same are conducted electronically. (2) Societal trends in which the presence of and use of advanced electronic technology is both prevalent and predominant, creating lifestyles and social cultures that are technology driven. Syn. Cashless society, digital economy, friction-free economy, e-business, mobile economy, m-economy, entertainment economy, intangible economy. [1998, Wallace R. Wood, Houston TX]

For an “official” recognition of this new term, visit the Merriam-Webster On-Line Open Dictionary site.
——————————————————
Indeed, we truly are living in a “Diginomic World.” It’s only a matter of time before the full application is realized.

Comment on A time and a place by Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips

Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:01:00 +0000

Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips…

I Have To Agree, You Said it well…

Comment on Transport by anton van der burgt

anton van der burgt — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:57:34 +0000

the presentation slides are not available, pls repair the link

Comment on Margaret’s write-up of the Wealth of Networks Event by Quentin

Quentin — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:29:58 +0000

I think John was basically talking non-sense. The idea of Interner Angel is similar to the idea of single identity provider. This is on one side undoable, on the other it is also a single point of failure and seucrity risk.

The asymetric aspect of the Internet is slowely being balanced with Web 2.0 technologies that allow interaction. And as in normal life, asymmetry is part of it.

Comment on Transport by Panel presentations posted « The Wealth of Networks

Panel presentations posted « The Wealth of Networks — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:48:03 +0000

[...] The panel presentations from the event have now been linked from the individual pages. Currently, Transport, e-Healthcare, Diginomics and Cascade of Information are [...]

Comment on Margaret’s write-up of the Wealth of Networks Event by Sam Mbale

Sam Mbale — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:26:20 +0000

Great write up maggie. Thanks again for sharing this!

Comment on What’s up with The Wealth of Networks by goldenbushel

goldenbushel — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:49:24 +0000

Hi Annamaria,

Because we knew that we weren’t going to have wifi coverage during the event, we decided not to proceed with launching the backchannel. We’re hoping that enough conversations can be captured here, on twitter and in the blogroll…

But if we got it wrong and there’s still a use for the Backchannel, let us know – we can still get that live.